By Semperpapa
All conservative pundits and various candidates for the 2012 November elections, at any level, like to campaign on the slogan that the Obama administration in the last three years has been an abysmal disaster, but I completely disagree.
For the real aim of Obama and his minions, the last three years have been a stunning success.
During the 2008 presidential campaigning, then Sen. Obama was able and incredibly successful in his quest to mask the very intentions of his candidacy. The smoking screen was that of the first black president, destined to represent the healing of a Nation with a past of racial inequality and discrimination.
He told us that he was going to be the President of all Americans, even those who disagree with him. He told us he was going to lower the ocean levels and convince those who hate America and want us destroyed that now, with his radical presence in the White House, America was going to be more open to fairness, less arrogant, less confrontational.
He run on the promise that he was going to end wars and bring home an over-extended, tired Military, because, after all, just his election was going to eliminate the need for us to be in any war. He even gave Arab news outlet Al-Jazzera, the very first interview as president, and went on an apology tour.
His appeal to those Americans who entrusted him with their vote was based on many different factors, everyone of which fostered by either ideology or blindness.
Every leftist progressive voted for him, mostly because he practically embodies the level of radicalism they have been looking and working for for many years. What was the experience that Obama brought to his political career? Nothing more than political and radical activism, conducted in Chicago, where the enviroment of corruption is of national and historical fame.
While the media completely ignored any vetting that was being done in the months leading to the 2008 elections, progressives were ecstatic about the fact that the truth about the "qualification" of Barak Obama to hold the office of the presidency was going completely and purposely ignored.
The mole was in.
To compound the perfect storm, a relentless campaign was conducted by Obama, his organization, the media and academia, to apply a label of "racist" to anyone who actually saw the danger of Obama in the White House. Shaming ignorant and malleable folks to vote for the man was a truly masterfully completed objective and accomplishment on the part of the enemies of America.
Was there racism in the 2008 presidential elections? Of course there was, but the most blatant demonstration of racism was the one demonstrated by black America. Nobody can tell me that Obama receiving over 95% of black votes was not racially motivated.
But the complicity of a corrupted and immoral media conglomeration insured that this fact was going to be downplayed or totally swept under the rug.
Yes, Obama presidency has been a stunning success, from its campaign throughout its first term.
Obama wanted the presidency to promote his Marxist ideology of class envy. It is only through the successful division of the population that such agenda can be achieved. In a country like the United States, classes have not been part of the common lexicon for decades. One of the aspects of the American that attracts immigrants so powerfully is exactly that: the only pre-requisite for success in America is the willingness to work hard and to take chances, chances that are fostered by a governmental system that promotes, supports and rewards entrepreneurship and hard work.
What Obama wanted to create was a new sense of classification among the people. Talks of the "middle class" the "rich" the "poor" all it accomplishes is a growing distrust among Americans.
One of the most important aspects of the exceptionalism of America resides in the unity among the people, unity of purpose and dedication toward one common goal: national success.
It is an interesting dichotomy I am referring to. On one hand, it is the individualistic attitude that makes America strongest, but similarly the individuals come together as one, as Americans for the achievement of the best for our country, the common good. But the adoration of some misguided females and the brainless following of the Obamadroids was enough to guarantee that this thug from the streets of Chicago, a politician who has never held a meaningful job, could maintain, increase and abuse power, by dividing and conquering the American people. And he's been stunningly successful.
Never in the history of our Nation since the Civil War, the population has been as divided as it is these days.
Just in the last couple of weeks we have seen Obama coming out of the closet in support of gay marriage. He does not care in the least. He wants the homosexual vote and even if the anti-gay marriage black are showing their disagreement, Obama knows well that the black population will still vote for him because he's black. Nor he cares about the Hispanics, who may also be against gay marriage for religious reasons, because he trusts that pinning illegal aliens against the majority of the American people will push the Hispanic vote in his camp.
Divide and conquer...
(...to be continued...)
Wednesday, May 30, 2012
Friday, May 18, 2012
When Wealth Is Condoned
By Semperpapa
I have finally grasped the message being shoved down the American people's throats these days by the elitist leadership and various droids: Wealth is good as long as the "right" people and conditions are met.
The operative word is not "right" as in conservative, but as correct or PC or progressive.
Ultimately, if you are a person attacking the capitalistic system while using abusing and greatly benefiting financially from the exercise of the freedom that capitalism and free market affords you, than your accumulation of wealth is legitimate and well deserved.
Attacking left wing millionaires and billionaires is not cool, because they have the right to be rich and they deserve the riches.
Michael Moore is entitled not only to make a fortune in the production of movies that attack America, but he is also entitled to keep most of his money, including exercise legal action to make sure that every cent he feels he deserves gets to him.
George Clooney, and all the other clueless Hollywood elitists, feels he is entitled to make tens of millions of dollars for his appearance in a flick, way more than any of the other actors in the same flick, and why? Because he feels he is entitled to more as name recognition in that industry is an advertisement in itself. But what about all the other actors in the same flick? Should they not be compensated equally?
Bono, the famous liberal singer of the Irish band U2, has been making a career and a great following of social environmentalist morons out of his denouncement of greedy capitalistic financial systems, and yet it looks like good old Bono will be making approximately $1B out of his investments in the Facebook IPO. How's that for social consciousness!
This is a practice the Left is really good at. It is simply called "hypocrisy" and it is standard operating procedures for the enemies of freedom.
Progressives can freely exercise their financial freedom of investment that only Capitalism can give them, but anyone else who does the same while not espousing the Communist ideology, is instantly greedy, crooked and racist.
Making money is the reason cause people take chances and start businesses, the reason cause people go to work. The current leadership, truly merely self proclaimed leadership as they are no leaders in the least, could not care less about the freedom or even the ability of the American people to open or run a business or even to go to work. They could not care less about creating the right conditions for the private sector to create jobs. These so called leaders are only interested in blowing smoke in the face of the people who are only seen as voting eggheads.
Progressive thinking is that if you are a liberal, making money is your "right" but if you are a conservative, than making money is the sign of your greed and a tell tale of your willingness to exploit some lower social form.
That is why we hear multi-millionaire stating that they would not mind paying more taxes. Warren Buffett and similar morons, want everyone else pay taxes through the nose, while they enjoy cheating and not paying theirs. These people say that the "rich" should pay more, but they are not receptive in exercising their freedom to pay more to the IRS voluntarily.
So I have a suggestion. All millionaires registered Democrat and supporting liberal politicians and liberal ideology, should have a flat tax rate of 80%. I am sure Will Smith, Eva Longoria and Buffett will be satisfied about the government "taking care" of the needs of the people.
All others, should be afforded the freedom to keep more of their money or pay more if they want to.
I believe the situation would stimulate the economy out of the recession. All the money that Longoria wants me to pay for her beloved illegal aliens could be paid by her and her peers. And maybe she could buy herself some knowledge and wisdom. Or maybe not.
The irony of all this is that all these so called liberal millionaires live a life of true luxury, while trashing the life of luxury conservative millionaires live. What sense does that make?
Unless throwing a lavish, rich and decadent party during which one speaks against Bush or global warming, automatically absolves them from their excesses. That must be it!
Wealth accumulation and retention is basically condoned only when those doing it conform with the liberal progressive ideology.
So Obama spoke, so it will be written. Pharaoh Obama has spoken...
Just my thoughts!
I have finally grasped the message being shoved down the American people's throats these days by the elitist leadership and various droids: Wealth is good as long as the "right" people and conditions are met.
The operative word is not "right" as in conservative, but as correct or PC or progressive.
Ultimately, if you are a person attacking the capitalistic system while using abusing and greatly benefiting financially from the exercise of the freedom that capitalism and free market affords you, than your accumulation of wealth is legitimate and well deserved.
Attacking left wing millionaires and billionaires is not cool, because they have the right to be rich and they deserve the riches.
Michael Moore is entitled not only to make a fortune in the production of movies that attack America, but he is also entitled to keep most of his money, including exercise legal action to make sure that every cent he feels he deserves gets to him.
George Clooney, and all the other clueless Hollywood elitists, feels he is entitled to make tens of millions of dollars for his appearance in a flick, way more than any of the other actors in the same flick, and why? Because he feels he is entitled to more as name recognition in that industry is an advertisement in itself. But what about all the other actors in the same flick? Should they not be compensated equally?
Bono, the famous liberal singer of the Irish band U2, has been making a career and a great following of social environmentalist morons out of his denouncement of greedy capitalistic financial systems, and yet it looks like good old Bono will be making approximately $1B out of his investments in the Facebook IPO. How's that for social consciousness!
This is a practice the Left is really good at. It is simply called "hypocrisy" and it is standard operating procedures for the enemies of freedom.
Progressives can freely exercise their financial freedom of investment that only Capitalism can give them, but anyone else who does the same while not espousing the Communist ideology, is instantly greedy, crooked and racist.
Making money is the reason cause people take chances and start businesses, the reason cause people go to work. The current leadership, truly merely self proclaimed leadership as they are no leaders in the least, could not care less about the freedom or even the ability of the American people to open or run a business or even to go to work. They could not care less about creating the right conditions for the private sector to create jobs. These so called leaders are only interested in blowing smoke in the face of the people who are only seen as voting eggheads.
Progressive thinking is that if you are a liberal, making money is your "right" but if you are a conservative, than making money is the sign of your greed and a tell tale of your willingness to exploit some lower social form.
That is why we hear multi-millionaire stating that they would not mind paying more taxes. Warren Buffett and similar morons, want everyone else pay taxes through the nose, while they enjoy cheating and not paying theirs. These people say that the "rich" should pay more, but they are not receptive in exercising their freedom to pay more to the IRS voluntarily.
So I have a suggestion. All millionaires registered Democrat and supporting liberal politicians and liberal ideology, should have a flat tax rate of 80%. I am sure Will Smith, Eva Longoria and Buffett will be satisfied about the government "taking care" of the needs of the people.
All others, should be afforded the freedom to keep more of their money or pay more if they want to.
I believe the situation would stimulate the economy out of the recession. All the money that Longoria wants me to pay for her beloved illegal aliens could be paid by her and her peers. And maybe she could buy herself some knowledge and wisdom. Or maybe not.
The irony of all this is that all these so called liberal millionaires live a life of true luxury, while trashing the life of luxury conservative millionaires live. What sense does that make?
Unless throwing a lavish, rich and decadent party during which one speaks against Bush or global warming, automatically absolves them from their excesses. That must be it!
Wealth accumulation and retention is basically condoned only when those doing it conform with the liberal progressive ideology.
So Obama spoke, so it will be written. Pharaoh Obama has spoken...
Just my thoughts!
Thursday, May 10, 2012
America: The New Twilight Zone
By Semperpapa
I thought it was just me losing my mind, but the Twilight Zone musical theme continues to pop up in my mind with increasingly and disturbing frequency.
Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who has been pro-active in his attempt to combat illegal immigration, is being sued by U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder.
The accusations are that Arpaio has been using unconstitutional methods in handling Hispanic inmates.
My questions is: are you for real?
When it comes to the United States Constitution, there has been very few AGs in the history of our country who have trashed the Constitution as much as the current squatters at the DoJ and the White House.
In the spirit of the Constitution, one of the few real duties of the federal government is the protection of our international borders, a duty that the current administration, as much as many of the previous ones, has been absolutely incompetent.
And this is not the correct word. Incompetence implies the inability to do the right thing, but in the case of Obama and Holder and the entire regime, the problem is not inability to do things right, but the conscientious effort to do what is absolutely wrong and detrimental to our social and political system.
So while Holder is purposely ignoring black-on-white criminal federal prosecution (i.e. the Black Panthers voter intimidation crime of election day 2008 in Philadelphia), the Obamamedia, in full campaign mode, goes looking for some prank Romney did in High School.
And the sad and infuriating aspect of all this is that there are quite few American people who continue to be more interested in what Romney might have done in High School than what Obama and his minions are doing today. The Media is pursuing a story on Romney that is as I write, falling apart, but in the past have refused to even give a second look at Obama's own admission that he was basically a crack head in HS.
And the Twilight Zone music keeps on playing in my head...
Just my thoughts!
I thought it was just me losing my mind, but the Twilight Zone musical theme continues to pop up in my mind with increasingly and disturbing frequency.
Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who has been pro-active in his attempt to combat illegal immigration, is being sued by U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder.
The accusations are that Arpaio has been using unconstitutional methods in handling Hispanic inmates.
My questions is: are you for real?
When it comes to the United States Constitution, there has been very few AGs in the history of our country who have trashed the Constitution as much as the current squatters at the DoJ and the White House.
In the spirit of the Constitution, one of the few real duties of the federal government is the protection of our international borders, a duty that the current administration, as much as many of the previous ones, has been absolutely incompetent.
And this is not the correct word. Incompetence implies the inability to do the right thing, but in the case of Obama and Holder and the entire regime, the problem is not inability to do things right, but the conscientious effort to do what is absolutely wrong and detrimental to our social and political system.
So while Holder is purposely ignoring black-on-white criminal federal prosecution (i.e. the Black Panthers voter intimidation crime of election day 2008 in Philadelphia), the Obamamedia, in full campaign mode, goes looking for some prank Romney did in High School.
And the sad and infuriating aspect of all this is that there are quite few American people who continue to be more interested in what Romney might have done in High School than what Obama and his minions are doing today. The Media is pursuing a story on Romney that is as I write, falling apart, but in the past have refused to even give a second look at Obama's own admission that he was basically a crack head in HS.
And the Twilight Zone music keeps on playing in my head...
Just my thoughts!
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
Beacon Of Freedom No More
By Semperpapa
Growing up in Italy in the 1960s and 1970s and the height of the Cold War, there was only one simple element that allowed my family to have some hope, and that was the possibility, should the Soviet tanks finally roll into our streets, that we could somehow seek and obtain political asylum in the United States by reaching either the embassy or the local consulate office.
And we were not alone, as every Western European country had individuals with secret plans of how to get to one of such locations of freedom should the necessity to escape dictatorship arise.
Even after the fall of the Soviet Union, seeking asylum from oppression at the doors of a safe heaven like an American official site has been the goal of every person wanting to live in peace.
But the image of America as a beacon of peace is finally gone. The forces of totalitarianism that have been lurking in the dark dungeons of America's progressive movement have achieved what countless foreign entities have failed to achieve over more than two centuries.
America is a beacon of freedom no more!
On the wake of the latest story about Chinese dissident Chen Guangcheng attempt to reach the US Embassy in China, this following story has just surfaced.
http://freebeacon.com/defection-denied-2/
This is what political expediency and pandering on the part of the scum occupying the White House and Congress has brought us: the loss of hope for millions.
Indeed, America was a beacon of hope for those human beings seeking liberty, but today has become the land of Obama and his ilks. The sacrifice of the principles that have characterized our short history has been decided by the power monsters that walk the halls of our capital.
Just my thoughts!
Growing up in Italy in the 1960s and 1970s and the height of the Cold War, there was only one simple element that allowed my family to have some hope, and that was the possibility, should the Soviet tanks finally roll into our streets, that we could somehow seek and obtain political asylum in the United States by reaching either the embassy or the local consulate office.
And we were not alone, as every Western European country had individuals with secret plans of how to get to one of such locations of freedom should the necessity to escape dictatorship arise.
Even after the fall of the Soviet Union, seeking asylum from oppression at the doors of a safe heaven like an American official site has been the goal of every person wanting to live in peace.
But the image of America as a beacon of peace is finally gone. The forces of totalitarianism that have been lurking in the dark dungeons of America's progressive movement have achieved what countless foreign entities have failed to achieve over more than two centuries.
America is a beacon of freedom no more!
On the wake of the latest story about Chinese dissident Chen Guangcheng attempt to reach the US Embassy in China, this following story has just surfaced.
http://freebeacon.com/defection-denied-2/
This is what political expediency and pandering on the part of the scum occupying the White House and Congress has brought us: the loss of hope for millions.
Indeed, America was a beacon of hope for those human beings seeking liberty, but today has become the land of Obama and his ilks. The sacrifice of the principles that have characterized our short history has been decided by the power monsters that walk the halls of our capital.
Just my thoughts!
Semper America Rants On Facebook
Hey friends,
Don't forget that my rants, and mini-rants, are also on Facebook. Just search for Semper America and "like" my page...
Thanks folks and God bless our Troops and our Nation. We sure need it!
Frank Semperpapa
Don't forget that my rants, and mini-rants, are also on Facebook. Just search for Semper America and "like" my page...
Thanks folks and God bless our Troops and our Nation. We sure need it!
Frank Semperpapa
Nancy Pelosi Not Honest? Really?
By Semperpapa
No way, I said, as I read the statements of former CIA agent Jose Rodriguez. There is no way I am going to believe that someone so ethical, honest and whatever else like Pelosi would actually lie about anything.
OK, time to turn sarcasm off.
According to Rodriguez, and a pile of documentation backing his story up, the former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi had been briefed about the enhanced interrogation techniques used by the CIA in the years following the September 11, 2001 attacks, on captured terrorists, for the purpose of gaining information on future attacks against our nation.
Repeatedly, Pelosi has rejected the insinuations that she had any knowledge of such enhanced interrogations techniques, stating that she would have not stand for torture. The truth of the matter is that in those dark days following the 9-11 attacks, every single politician was running scared, and for many reasons.
The high profile nature of these folks job and the fact tat they are always so ready and happy to place their faces in front of a camera or microphone make them targets for any follower of the religion of peace.
Moreover, being seen as supporters of what misguided progressive idiots call torture makes them targets for the ultra leftist fringe of unwashed bottom feeders, especially at a time when the Obama regime was unleashing the DoJ dogs against CIA operatives connected to Guantanamo.
Nancy Pelosi, well aware of the truth and of documentation proving it, went on record few years back denouncing at first any knowledge of such tortures occurring and later that she had been assured waterboarding was not being used. On both accounts, according to Rodriguez, the California congresswoman is at best failing to properly remembering or at worst being untruthful.
So what it really comes down to is credibility of two individuals: Rodriguez or Pelosi.
Well, I am going to be as diplomatic as I possibly can, but my bet is definitely on Rodriguez.
There is no way in hell that I would believe the word of a seasoned, corrupted, power hungry political beast like Pelosi over that of a CIA operative who has been fighting an unknown and dangerous war for the safety of America. This does not mean that I have blind faith in everything that Mr. Rodriguez says, after all I don't know the man, but in a contrast with trusting the ugly witch of the West or him, he wins hands down.
And couple of words about torturing.
I am sorry to disagree with Leslie Stahl about the Orwellian actions taken by CIA interrogators upon the terrorist. During her interview of Jose Rodriguez, the CBS dimwit could not mask her horror at the admission from Rodriguez that they had given Khalid Sheikh Mohammed the dietary supplement Ensure (a high vitamin, high protein drink used in hospitals to give cancer patients dietary supplements they would not get otherwise). Stahl called it "dietary manipulation" and America does not do that! (Of course unless you are Mooochelle Obama and you want to tell 300 million people what to eat, but I digress).
As I recover from from the horror of hearing that the operational mastermind of the 9-11 attacks had been forced to drink a dietary concoction, I became even more enraged by the fact that it was in part my tax money that paid for those drinks.
Hey, if I have to pay for torture of these sub-humans, I want to see fingernails ripped off, electrodes attached to genitals, power drill action.
Now that's good old fashion torture! Definitely nothing that the elitist morons like Pelosi or Stahl would know if it smacked them in the face.
We the People, on the other hand, have had to endure two years of looking at Pelosi ugly face as third in line to the Presidency: we KNOW what torture is.
Just my thoughts!
No way, I said, as I read the statements of former CIA agent Jose Rodriguez. There is no way I am going to believe that someone so ethical, honest and whatever else like Pelosi would actually lie about anything.
OK, time to turn sarcasm off.
According to Rodriguez, and a pile of documentation backing his story up, the former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi had been briefed about the enhanced interrogation techniques used by the CIA in the years following the September 11, 2001 attacks, on captured terrorists, for the purpose of gaining information on future attacks against our nation.
Repeatedly, Pelosi has rejected the insinuations that she had any knowledge of such enhanced interrogations techniques, stating that she would have not stand for torture. The truth of the matter is that in those dark days following the 9-11 attacks, every single politician was running scared, and for many reasons.
The high profile nature of these folks job and the fact tat they are always so ready and happy to place their faces in front of a camera or microphone make them targets for any follower of the religion of peace.
Moreover, being seen as supporters of what misguided progressive idiots call torture makes them targets for the ultra leftist fringe of unwashed bottom feeders, especially at a time when the Obama regime was unleashing the DoJ dogs against CIA operatives connected to Guantanamo.
Nancy Pelosi, well aware of the truth and of documentation proving it, went on record few years back denouncing at first any knowledge of such tortures occurring and later that she had been assured waterboarding was not being used. On both accounts, according to Rodriguez, the California congresswoman is at best failing to properly remembering or at worst being untruthful.
So what it really comes down to is credibility of two individuals: Rodriguez or Pelosi.
Well, I am going to be as diplomatic as I possibly can, but my bet is definitely on Rodriguez.
There is no way in hell that I would believe the word of a seasoned, corrupted, power hungry political beast like Pelosi over that of a CIA operative who has been fighting an unknown and dangerous war for the safety of America. This does not mean that I have blind faith in everything that Mr. Rodriguez says, after all I don't know the man, but in a contrast with trusting the ugly witch of the West or him, he wins hands down.
And couple of words about torturing.
I am sorry to disagree with Leslie Stahl about the Orwellian actions taken by CIA interrogators upon the terrorist. During her interview of Jose Rodriguez, the CBS dimwit could not mask her horror at the admission from Rodriguez that they had given Khalid Sheikh Mohammed the dietary supplement Ensure (a high vitamin, high protein drink used in hospitals to give cancer patients dietary supplements they would not get otherwise). Stahl called it "dietary manipulation" and America does not do that! (Of course unless you are Mooochelle Obama and you want to tell 300 million people what to eat, but I digress).
As I recover from from the horror of hearing that the operational mastermind of the 9-11 attacks had been forced to drink a dietary concoction, I became even more enraged by the fact that it was in part my tax money that paid for those drinks.
Hey, if I have to pay for torture of these sub-humans, I want to see fingernails ripped off, electrodes attached to genitals, power drill action.
Now that's good old fashion torture! Definitely nothing that the elitist morons like Pelosi or Stahl would know if it smacked them in the face.
We the People, on the other hand, have had to endure two years of looking at Pelosi ugly face as third in line to the Presidency: we KNOW what torture is.
Just my thoughts!
Tuesday, May 1, 2012
When Class Does Not Matter
By Semperpapa
As in President Obama.
No there is obviously nothing wrong in a politician to self-praise for his or her accomplishment, but in the case of Obama and the killing of Bin Laden, the lack of any class or respect for the office of the Presidency and what it really represents for the American people, is appalling.
What would be acceptable is that the President would call the assassination of Osama Bin Laden an administration accomplishment in the arena of foreign policy and national security. But to parade as a blow fish and use the action in political ads goes well beyond the acceptable.
The action in Pakistan that netted the killing of the most hated sub-human for America, and many other civilized nations, was based on intelligence investigation that Mr. Obama not only had nothing to do with, but that he even tried to literally kill as he instructed his DoJ to investigate CIA operatives connected with Guantanamo Bay.
Moreover, the information that initially sparked the sequence of events which brought SEAL Team 6 to the compound where Osama was holed up, was obtained by the same people Obama criticized and via methodologies that he, Obama, vehemently opposed while pandering to the ultra left during the 2008 campaign.
The CIA memo that also has surfaced indicating that Obama had indicated that a Navy admiral was the author of the official authorization for the raid and the verbiage aimed at covering Obama's ass if things would have gone wrong, further indicates that the "courageous" leader wanted the political victory the action was going to bring if successful, but was ready to unload the blame if not.
This is the true sign of a cunning, successful politician and a lousy, despicable leader, descriptions that fit Obama very closely.
Than there is the use of the action heroically conducted by exceptional warriors in the political ad, which saw not only Obama taking credit for the actions of others, but also insinuating that his likely Republican opponent Mitt Romney would not have authorized the raid.
In the first place, there is no way that Obama can make such statement in honesty, but honesty is definitely not part of the DNA of this Chicago politician.
Secondly, as Romney responded, every president deserving such title would have authorized the mission with the info in hand. "Even Jimmy Carter" Romney added.
But Obama was not satisfied and actually double down accusing Romney of rejecting any action inside the so called ally Pakistan, just another Obama lie as Romney, paraphrasing, actually stated in 2007 that he would never take anything off the table , just he would never publicize it. Exactly right.
Obama's drive to political power is so perverted that he would have no problems in divulging sensitive info if it meant pandering to some voting block (and even leaking secret plans of our allies if necessary).
Some have qualified Romney answer as undignified by the mentioning of Carter's name, but I actually think that it is time toll it like it is, no more sugar coating. The stakes are the survival of our country.
Today we hear that Obama has made a surprise trip to Afghanistan to confer with Karzai and that there will be an Obama presser from the A-stan later (probably an official statement of surrender followed by an apology).
We can be assured that the Commander-in-Chief will somehow use the Military again as a campaign sound board, again a campaign stunt courtesy of the American taxpayers.
It is already awful to see a Nation slowly being brought down to its knees by the coordinated efforts of a relatively small number of radical tyrannical Marxists, but to add insult to injury, Obama is purposely doing so using our money and smearing that fact all over our collective faces, almost daring us to protest. And be labeled racist.
Oh well, I have been called worst...
Just my thoughts!
As in President Obama.
No there is obviously nothing wrong in a politician to self-praise for his or her accomplishment, but in the case of Obama and the killing of Bin Laden, the lack of any class or respect for the office of the Presidency and what it really represents for the American people, is appalling.
What would be acceptable is that the President would call the assassination of Osama Bin Laden an administration accomplishment in the arena of foreign policy and national security. But to parade as a blow fish and use the action in political ads goes well beyond the acceptable.
The action in Pakistan that netted the killing of the most hated sub-human for America, and many other civilized nations, was based on intelligence investigation that Mr. Obama not only had nothing to do with, but that he even tried to literally kill as he instructed his DoJ to investigate CIA operatives connected with Guantanamo Bay.
Moreover, the information that initially sparked the sequence of events which brought SEAL Team 6 to the compound where Osama was holed up, was obtained by the same people Obama criticized and via methodologies that he, Obama, vehemently opposed while pandering to the ultra left during the 2008 campaign.
The CIA memo that also has surfaced indicating that Obama had indicated that a Navy admiral was the author of the official authorization for the raid and the verbiage aimed at covering Obama's ass if things would have gone wrong, further indicates that the "courageous" leader wanted the political victory the action was going to bring if successful, but was ready to unload the blame if not.
This is the true sign of a cunning, successful politician and a lousy, despicable leader, descriptions that fit Obama very closely.
Than there is the use of the action heroically conducted by exceptional warriors in the political ad, which saw not only Obama taking credit for the actions of others, but also insinuating that his likely Republican opponent Mitt Romney would not have authorized the raid.
In the first place, there is no way that Obama can make such statement in honesty, but honesty is definitely not part of the DNA of this Chicago politician.
Secondly, as Romney responded, every president deserving such title would have authorized the mission with the info in hand. "Even Jimmy Carter" Romney added.
But Obama was not satisfied and actually double down accusing Romney of rejecting any action inside the so called ally Pakistan, just another Obama lie as Romney, paraphrasing, actually stated in 2007 that he would never take anything off the table , just he would never publicize it. Exactly right.
Obama's drive to political power is so perverted that he would have no problems in divulging sensitive info if it meant pandering to some voting block (and even leaking secret plans of our allies if necessary).
Some have qualified Romney answer as undignified by the mentioning of Carter's name, but I actually think that it is time toll it like it is, no more sugar coating. The stakes are the survival of our country.
Today we hear that Obama has made a surprise trip to Afghanistan to confer with Karzai and that there will be an Obama presser from the A-stan later (probably an official statement of surrender followed by an apology).
We can be assured that the Commander-in-Chief will somehow use the Military again as a campaign sound board, again a campaign stunt courtesy of the American taxpayers.
It is already awful to see a Nation slowly being brought down to its knees by the coordinated efforts of a relatively small number of radical tyrannical Marxists, but to add insult to injury, Obama is purposely doing so using our money and smearing that fact all over our collective faces, almost daring us to protest. And be labeled racist.
Oh well, I have been called worst...
Just my thoughts!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
