No More Star & Stripe, Only White Flag For America

By Semperpapa

The everlasting symbol of the current White House: the white flag!
And no I am not being duplicitous with my words, just observant.

What I am talking about is the sudden announcement yesterday of the decision that Obama wants to reduce the number of American nuclear weapons by 80%.
This move, according to the usual apologists from the regime media like the Associated Press, is just Obama making good of his campaign promises and desires to eliminate, as the American president, nuclear weapons worldwide.
Surely a noble goal to have, together with the lowering of the ocean waters and the elimination of poverty and the coexistence of radical Islam with the West, but seemingly not much more than a utopian bunch of bull crap.

The truth of the matter is that the belief the world is under any circumstance safer today that it was during the Cold War is false. In some respect it is actually more dangerous than that, as the mutual assured destruction policies of deterrence may have no meaning any longer.

For instance, after the fall of the Soviet Union, intellectual knowledge regarding nuclear weapons from America's past foe, has been on sale to the highest bidder. Considering that a lot of the world's wealth has been concentrated in the Middle East and in view of the advancement of radical Islam we are witnessing thanks to the so called Arab Spring, the chance of nuclear weapon technology, or any other weapon of mass destruction technology for that matter, to fall in the hands of radical Islamists is very high.

Ron Paul's indifference to the possibility not withstanding, the ability of radical Islam to have access to such weapons is not something that common sense people can actually embrace. Call me crazy, but a culture that is in love with the mere idea of mass human death and destruction in the name of a pedophile prophet should not be allowed to possess the very tool by which they could easily achieve their bloody scheme.

But Obama is determined to surrender the Nation to the enemies of America without not even a hint at self defense. Why?
I know that the apologist and cult-like followers of Obama will respond that Obama got bin Laden, after all the sole achievement of positive nature from this administration, but considering that the ability to reach Osama was created by George W.'s policies and the actual action was conducted by Navy SEALs, members of the hated US Military, it is really humorous that the liberals place so much upon that sole event to demonstrate Obama's national security "achievements". All the man had to do was say "GO" after having weighed in any potential personal political repercussion from the action.

The reason for the waving of the white flag is the elections of November 2012. Obama is appeasing all the tree-hugging, flowers-in-the-barrel, I-Pad waving hippies of 2012. His action against bin Laden, the use of drones, the failure to close Guantanamo have alienated the lunatic left fringe, even if the destruction of the American economy and the emasculation of the Military has regained Obama some of the much needed support.
What is amusing to me is that Obama could do anything he wants without risking the delivery of votes next November from the fringe of American domestic enemies inspired by the Obama media. No matter what, the unwashed masses of the American Marxist left will vote for the man.

So here we are, cutting our nuclear arsenal by 80%, working to cut the Military budget by $1 trillion, and all the while Iran is marching undisturbed toward nuclear proliferation, North Korea remains an unknown entity with nuclear weapons and the Middle East is on the verge of exploding into an Islamic caliphate with Nuclear Iran as its strong harm, not to mention the Pakistani nuclear arsenal a coup away from being in the hands of al Qaeda.

This is all so reassuring, isn't it? And we have not even mentioned Russia!
But it is all in the plans, the plans of reducing our nation to the level of a third world country, breaking it down financially and culturally so that once at the very bottom of the socio-cultural abyss, progressives will ride in on their horses and save the day, asking ONLY, as a repayment, unlimited power for the foreseeable future.
And even the price of few hundred thousands innocent Americans, especially if from the throngs of those who cling to their Bibles and their guns, is acceptable for the achievement of power.
It was in China for Mao (40~70 million Chinese peasants sacrificed) or for Stalin in the Soviet Union (20~40 million Russian peasants sacrificed), it would be for king Obama and queen Michelle.

Just my thoughts!

Neck at Neck

By Semperpapa

It must be a race between the old idiot and the young moron and the score is pretty tie these days. That's why the old fool is once again going on the offensive (and he is a very offensive fool!)

What am I talking about? The race is the one for the accolade of the worst president this Nation has ever seen, the candidates? Barak Hussein Obama and Jimmy Carter.
It is a clear toss up for many to qualify either of these individuals with the title of "worst" and even if my opinion qualifies Obama as clearly way ahead of his senile competitor, I must acknowledge the enduring attempts of peanut brain Carter to gain terrain over the young Marxist.

One round is today going to Carter, as the state news outlet of North Korea has divulged a letter of condolences that the former president of the United States sent to Kim Jong un in the occasion of the death of his beloved father Kim Jong Il.

Yes, according to the Norks, the letter expressed the condolences of Carter to the new tub-o-lard Kim Jong un and the rest of the Korean people for the untimely passing of the long time dictator of that country.
Never mind that the old porky pig can be held accountable for the death of unknown innocent North Korean civilians of starvation and re-education.
Never mind that Kim is responsible for violent aggression against the South Korean civilian population.
All this is not a preoccupation for Mr. Carter who has never been concerned about anything related to personal accountability. And now he is expressing his sorrow for Kim's demise.
The only thing the world, and especially the N. Korean population, should be sorry for is that the ass hat did not die sooner, possibly taking Carter with him.

And the fact that Kim Jong Il sought and achieved nuclear weapons must be another source of sorrow for Carter for the loss of such a man. Wonder if Ron Paul joined Carter in his sorrow. After all I am sure Kim's beef against the United States and its allies was provoked by our actions and who are we to tell the Norks that they should not have nukes!

Isn't that correct, Congressman Paul?

Just my thoughts!