My Future Is NOT Islam

By Semperpapa

I have a problem with this statement, made by Obama at the United Nations on Tuesday.

“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam”

There are two ways I interpret this statement.

One is that Obama is so naïve about the whole reality of radical Islam, he is so ignorant about the goals and agendas of the Muslim leadership that he is practically merely bending over to the demands of those who are actively seeking the destruction of Western Civilization.

Appeasing the enemy is the only way Obama sees as the possibility of coexistence between Muslims and the rest of humanity is to conform to their demands. Just as Neville Chamberlain did in 1939, Obama is only delaying the inevitability of an open conflict by refusing to stand the Muslim invasion.

The other is that Obama is greatly sympathetic with the ideology of radical Islam. Even if we were willing to accept his Christianity, it appears that Obama’s Islamic background may still be conditioning his thinking and leanings to this day.

May it be because of his visceral anti-colonialist beliefs or because he favors the creation of an Islamic Caliphate, the open aversion toward Western Civilization, Israel and America itself seems to be the driving force for Obama stance on Middle East issues.
There is an innate fallacy in the statement.

If we follow the directives of radical Islam, the future only belongs to the followers of Mohamed and Shania law.

According to Islam, non-believers, or infidels, are either to be killed, enslaved or subject to extraordinary taxation. Anyone who converted to any religion from Islam, which includes our great Obama, is considered an apostate and deserving of immediate killing.
So, in contrast with the president’s statement, the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam, but being an infidel already qualifies me as someone who slanders the prophet, so there is no future for me.
After all, then, we Christians or Buddhists or any other religious believers do not have any future, and this I reject.
Sorry if I offend Muslims, but it is just not in my lexicon to kneel in front of any Islamic order or any pro-Islam presidential impostor.
The ideology of the religion of peace is one that promotes and justifies the annihilation of every one who does not believe like they do. Sure, I hear it all the time: the radicalized Muslims are just a small percentage of those who actually follow the religion and that may be true, but I have a great problem with those who remain silent as the small minority slaughter innocent people.
There is a profound understanding of the mentality of radical Islam I fully understand: they only comprehend and respect the application of power and violence. That is the way Mubarek and Gheddafi were able to maintain power over the Islamist hordes for decades.
On the other hand, appeasement and bowing to their radicalism only embolden their hatred and fuel their vision of conquest.

This is an American willing to only stand next to those who will forever fight against the barbaric hunger for power and subjugation.

Just my thoughts!