The Massacre That Is Ignored

By Semperpapa

In all the talking we have been graced with about mass killings and murders, there is one that is not only ignored, but has been swept under the proverbial carpet hoping that the American people, busy with all the other problems affecting our society, would just forget.

It is another massacre that the current regime has been treating in the most ignominious and despicable way possible: the terror attack at Ft. Hood.

The latest on that particular tragedy are that court proceedings are being held up by Maj. Nidal Hasan's beard. In the meantime, the victims of that shooting, at least those who have not died, are denied the proper recognition, and benefits, they deserve because a corrupted report from the government classified the massacre as "workplace violence."

I will not engage in expressing my disgust and outrage toward the injustice being perpetrated against the victims of Hasan, nor I will go beyond mentioning that while those who were wounded in the attack have physical, enotional and financial wounds that are ignored while Hasan is still receiving his regular Army pay.
What I want to address here is how this attack fits, or better yet does not fit, the regime's narrative on the latest attack against the 2nd Amendment.

The regime, which I qualify as being the consortium of criminal politicians, corrupted media and degenerate Hollywood, is purposely ignoring the 16 people killed and dozen wounded because it is not advantageous to their cause.

If there is a place where the control of firearms is absolute, that place is a military base. Every weapon and round of ammunition is strictly controlled and accounted for. Walking around a military base, one would be inclined to believe that, with the exception of military police, no weapon is anywhere to be found.
Under this premise, and if one wants to believe in the lies spewed by liberal progressive anti-gun zealots, there should be no way possible that an individual could bring multiple pistols on the premises and gun down 16 innocent people.
This reasoning goes along the one addressing the fact that in Chicago, where gun control is strictest, it is impossible that the murder rate in that city is the highest in the country.

And yet, with all the possible restrictions regarding firearms on Ft. Hood's grounds, Hasan was determined to exact his jihad revenge against his enemy. And he succeeded.

There is also another aspect of that tragedy that not only debunks the regime's notion that restricting the 2nd Amendment rights of lawful citizens would curtail any further tragedies like the Sandy Hook massacre. This aspect also proves, beyond reasonable doubt, that the statement from NRA Wayne LaPierre is absolutely true: the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to have a good guy with a gun.
This was proven by the fact that it was a federal police officer, with her gun, who shot and stopped Hasan from committing further mayhem.

Similarly, one can say that if any of the students at Virginia Tech, or the movie goers in Aurora, or any of the teachers at Sandy Hook would have been allowed to have firearms, maybe fewer people would have been killed.
As for the Ft. Hood massacre, I cannot dismiss my thinking that the fact the victims were mostly Army soldiers and that the murderer is a Muslim are major incentives for the current regime to want to cover the incident and make it disappear.

Indeed, that tragedy seem to debunk everything Obama and his droids are peddling to the American people regarding gun control.

1. Gun free zones are synonym with killing fields;
2. No matter how many laws, you cannot stop determined criminals;
3. It is not the tool that kills, but the hand holding it.

The true aim of the regime is not the safety of children. that is merely the propaganda mantra that Obama knows works well on the same ignorant Americans who re-elected him and those who are more inclined to react with emotion instead of common sense.
The tragedy in Connecticut was one of the darkest days of our history because it touched the most innocent portion of our society, but the most effective reaction to it should be one of fight, not surrender. Taking firearms away from law abiding citizens surrenders our safety to those elements of our society who are not interested in laws in the first place.
Obama and his droids are basically using the tragedy in Newtown to further the anti-Second Amendment agenda. They are not looking for solutions that could possibly reduce the eventuality of a similar occurrence. I cannot get out of my mind my conviction that all the "proposals" advanced by liberals were delineated in advance and just placed on a shelf waiting for the lucky tragedy to happen.

And in Newtown, luck was on their side.

Just my thoughts!