Moderate Fanatics

By Semperpapa

I received this e-mail from a friend. It was supposedly written by a well known psychiatrist, Dr. Emanuel Tanay.
Even if I could not verify the source, Dr. Tanay, I consider it irrelevant as the message in this piece is as valid as any American will ever see, plus the historical connotations are correct.
This should give Americans some food-for-thought.


A man, whose family was German aristocracy prior to World War II, owned a number of large industries and estates. When asked how many German people were true Nazis, the answer he gave can guide our attitude toward fanaticism.
'Very few people were true Nazis,' he said, 'but many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come.
My family lost everything. I ended up in a concentration camp and the Allies destroyed my factories.

'We are told again and again by 'experts' and 'talking heads' that Islam is the religion of peace, and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace. Although this unqualified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff, meant to make us feel better, and meant to somehow diminish the spectre of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam.
The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history.
It is the fanatics who march.
It is the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars worldwide.
It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave.
It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or honor-kill.
It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals.
It is the fanatics who teach their young to kill and to become suicide bombers.

The hard quantifiable fact is that the peaceful majority, the 'silent majority,' is cowed and extraneous. Communist Russia was comprised of Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 20 million people.
The peaceful majority were irrelevant.
China's huge population was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to kill a staggering 70 million people.
The average Japanese individual prior to World War II was not a warmongering sadist. Yet, Japan murdered and slaughtered its way across South East Asia in an orgy of killing that included the systematic murder of 12 million Chinese civilians; most killed by sword, shovel, and bayonet.
And, who can forget Rwanda, which collapsed into butchery. Could it not be said that the majority of Rwandans were 'peace loving'?

History lessons are often incredibly simple and blunt, yet for all our powers of reason we often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points: Peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence. Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy if they don't speak up, because like my friend from Germany, they will awaken one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun.

Peace-loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Serbs, Afghans, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians, and many others have died because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late.
As for us who watch it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that counts; the fanatics who threaten our way of life.
Lastly, anyone who doubts that the issue is serious and just deletes this email without sending it on, is contributing to the passiveness that allows the problems to expand. So, extend yourself a bit and send this on and on and on! Let us hope that thousands, world wide, read this and think about it, and send it on - before it's too late........

Emanuel Tanay, M.D.

Can anyone really argue the points made by Dr. Tanay? We have been treated to an avalanche of proofs for many years now.
Radical Muslims would conduct terrorist attacks against innocent civilians across the globe, especially directed to American and Israeli interests and the majority of Muslims, those who identify themselves as moderates, have remained principally silent.
Unforgettable were the scenes from the Palestinian territories after the attacks of 9-11-01, showing people taking to the streets celebrating with chants and sweets.
Those images quickly disappeared from the TV sets, in a concerted attempt to shield the American people from the reality of our enemy, but, most of all, to insure that the Muslim population in America, vast majority of which is labeled as "moderate", would not be targeted.

The America of 2001 was not one to go on a anti-Muslim rampage at home, but the main problem remained that, with just few exceptions, the Muslim community remained silent, and in some cases, actually made inflammatory statements.
The champion of Islamic moderation, imam Rauf, as he has been depicted since the Ground Zero mosque debacle started, was one of those "moderate" Muslim who, just few days following the 9-11 attacks, declared his belief that the United States shared the responsibilities for the terrorist attacks and that Osama bin Laden was a creation of the United States.

That's moderation.

Just my thoughts!