Orgasmic Left Give Praises To Their God

By Semperpapa

The engines of the aircraft that took ousted Osni Mubarak out of Cairo to the beach resort are not cool yet and the Obama worshipers of the American Media are already singing the praises of their Supreme Lord as the author of the “change” that took place in Egypt.

Wolf Blitzer at CNN (Counter fit Nonsense Network) is hinting that Obama speech in Cairo in 2009 could have been the spark of the movement we have seen in the streets of Egypt.

Chris Matthews at that obscure place called MSNBC appears to have regained the tingle up his leg from the president (I apologize for the visual!) as he says that it looks like the world was in need of Obama to witness the triumph of democracy in an Arab country.

I expect even more anti-America liberal Obama serfs to chime in any time.

I am surprised, though, that the Obama circus has gone so out of his way to engage in such an open support for the forces of the so called democracy at work in Egypt. My surprise comes form the absolute compromised position that Obama has taken, considering that the events in that country are all but settled and defined.

For one thing, Mubarak has not even left the country. Regardless of the stream of information that the Obamamedia has been feeding the American people, Mubarak is a former Egyptian army general. While he was president, the true entity holding the reins of power in Egypt was the military. So the people of Egypt supposedly relieved themselves of the presence of Mubarak, but are jubilant about the military being in control. My point is that except for the removal of their president, the Egyptian people have accomplished nothing.

One enormous unknown is what will be taking place in the next few weeks and months. A possibility that I have not heard from any pundit is that there may be a chance for Mubarak’s return or someone similar stepping into the situation, bringing the nation back into status quo.

The only certainty today in Egypt is that the future events are not going to be in the control of the people, but in the hands of a military establishment that has, in the past, done and undone at will.

But our never-to-be-ashamed media is going out and praise Obama for his stand with the people. And this is a dangerous game for the almighty Obama.

Lest the Obamamedia would lose the credibility they do not have anyway, the danger for Obama is huge, and one that I do not believe the cronies in the White House considered.

The first bad scenario for Obama could be if the Egyptian military, the true holder of the reins of power in the country, decides to utilize the action just taken to pacify the crowd, while at the same time perpetuating the same governing that has been doing this far.

They could put some other figure head in place of Mubarak and crack down on the dissenting factions across Egypt.

In this case, the result would be for Egypt not changing at all, going back to the same conditions it was under Mubarak, except that Obama would have spent so much political capital on that venture that a failure would mean few more nails in the man’s re-election coffin.

Consequences would be even more complicated for the United States strategic position in the region, as the actions of Obama, turning on an ally of 30+ years at such short notice, would deteriorate the already fragile trust that America enjoys in the region.

A second, and even more terrifying scenario, is that the radical Islamic fundamentalists of the Muslim Brotherhood will, in the end, be successful in bringing Egypt to a Sharia law controlled, radical Islamic government. The very first step toward the Caliphate they, and many other radical Muslims, have been seeking for so long.

In such an eventuality, the political consequences for Obama could spell disaster, as the American people would be faced with two choices of finger pointing, neither too flattering for the president.

One would be that Obama and his incompetent circus of foreign policy “experts” totally missed the potential implications of the events in Egypt. Jumping headlong into the support of a public uprising without clear and tangible vision of what the replacement was, would reaffirm the popular sentiment of the ineptitude of those in office who are supposed to be monitoring such events.

These folks are in charge of advancing and safeguarding the interests of the United States across the globe and to identify potential short and long term threats to American national security. If the events in Egypt, so adamantly supported by Obama, so adamantly claimed by the administration and the Obamamedia as a “feather in the cap” for this president turn out to be costly for the security of the Nation, Obama would reinforce the popular belief that he is really not fit to hold the office he was elected to. Just another failure, a very costly one, to be added to his foreign policy failures.

The second choice would be that the president is actually favoring the development of radical Islamic states.

There is already a perception among many Americans that Obama is a Muslim at heart, that he has deceived the American people on that subject, solely for the purpose of gaining the most powerful job in the world. The perception is not without merit, although Obama is the only one who really knows the truth, because of his overt favorable stance toward anything Muslim.

From removing the official classification of “radical Islamic terrorist” from the National Security lexicon to his support for the mosque at Ground Zero, from his involvement of radical Muslim organizations to National Security meetings to his apology tour following his elections, Mr. Obama appears to have had no reservations about adding fuel to the notion that he is, in the very least, sympathetic with the Muslim cause.

Should the uprising in Egypt result in the birth of another Islamic fundamentalist nation, with all the disastrous consequences associated with it, the ranks of American people who mistrusts his “Christianity” would swell up exponentially. And that could be politically very costly for him.

In any eventuality, the reaction from the White House and the state Department was rushed and, in my opinion, ill conceived. Regardless of all the cheerleading the Obamamedia does, regardless of the campaign of misinformation that is propagated by the regime in Washington and regardless of the continuous attempt to masquerade events, what the Obama administration will not be able to conceal is the succession of historical events. They may try to re-write history, but the truth will always be there for people to seek.

That is if they are interested in it.

Just my thoughts!