By Semperpapa
The process has been going on for over a year, mostly hidden in the bowels of Obama/Holder/Napolitano dark chamber. Occasionally we are exposed to some of the outrageous decisions the Washington crowd so desperately try to conceal from the American people. America is becoming some sort of a rubber band: at one end our ideals and beliefs, at the other the radical Liberal Progressives trying to destroy us. The one end held steady by the principles delineated by the US Constitution and our heritage, the other end steadily pulling in the direction of a fascist abyss. How long before the limit will be reached and the American people will say “enough”?
Case in point a very ill-publicized meeting held last month in Washington DC by Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano. The two day event saw the head of the federal agency in charge of the safety and security of the whole country sitting down with a selected group of Muslim, Arab and Sikh organizations. And some of these organizations have known ties with the terrorist organization called Muslim Brotherhood.
During the meeting, which again was not openly announced, Napolitano spent time briefing her guests about departmental policies regarding the agency’s efforts against counter-radicalization and counter-terrorism. To get a better understanding of the significance of this effort on the part of the Secretary, one must only imagine calling the local burglar to your home and explaining how the house alarm system works, and the reasoning would be to show willingness to compromise so that the burglar will skip your home.
The point of these meetings, which are scheduled to take place on a somewhat regular basis, is to allow sharing of information in order to create a better front against terrorism. The program is based on a similar one instituted in Great Britain, where the Muslim community is slowly but surely eroding the very fabric of British traditions, skillfully utilizing the scourge of multiculturalism and the cancer of Political Correctness in order to gain a radical foothold in that country’s culture. But while the Islamic forces accomplished the goal after years of patient subterfuge, in America it is the political establishment that is given them access to the highest levels of government.
To make things even more sinister, Matthew Chandler, Napolitano’s spokesman, refuses to give any details regarding the meetings or the groups that participated, obviously not counting, and actually hoping that the event was going to remain under the radar of the ever compliant Media, on the obsession for pure “in your face” propaganda that is characteristic of the radical Islamic forces at work in America. The Islamic groups were actually the ones to communicate with Pajama Media and to grant interviews.
While the focal point of outrage is directed toward Napolitano, we must realize that nothing in the current Administration happens without the blessing of President Obama, and that the event in question is just another step taken by him in his quest to appease and apologize to radical Islam.
Just as clearly indicated in the book Muslim Mafia by P. David Gaubatz and Paul Sperry, and confirmed by other counter-terrorist experts in the business, the idea of counter-radicalization, the concept of Muslim organizations’ contribution in the war on Terror, is the type of farce that parallels the wolf guarding the sheep. Although the nature and content of the meetings held by Napolitano is currently unknown, any knowledge of tactics and procedures employed by our Homeland security shared with groups tie with the Muslim Brotherhood is certain to make its way into the strategic banks of those elements of Islam actively involved in jihad against the United States. Any particular of our security systems and protocols in the hands of our enemies will only allow them to device the best action to defeat them.
And all is and will be handed over to them on a silver platter.
But why is this happening? Why is our government so inclined to reveal our security apparatus to our enemies? Is it just a case of ineptitude or is it taking PC to a dangerous point? Or is it the case of an ulterior more sinister motive? I can only take a position from my observation of past behavior. From the President speech of apology to the Muslim world to the handling of the Black Panthers voter intimidation case; from the case of Army Maj. Hasan and the massacre of Ft. Hood to the handling of Abdulmutallab on Christmas Day 2009, to the decision of granting legal rights to the 9-11-01 masterminds. It all points toward a prevailing disposition to appease, accommodate and facilitate the spreading of Islam within our borders.
Sure the President’s apologists will argue that these groups being engaged are valuable tools in understanding the enemy and why they want us dead, but I revert back to Gaubatz and Sperry’s book, where the same organizations have been infiltrating governmental institutions like Congress and federal law enforcement agencies like the FBI by using the same tactics based on cooperation against terrorism, while at the same time providing funds for terror organizations abroad and acting as fronts for them in this country.
On the same day that Michelle Malkin brings up Pajamas Media story about Napolitano’s summit, the news also broke of five US Army Arabic linguists being investigated at Ft. Jackson, South Carolina, for attempting to poison the food supply of the Army base.
Of course, what the American people will hear from the federal official will be that even this occurrence will be an isolated case, non terror related and of course we will be delighted by CAIR demands for their immediate clearing so not to upset the cooperation between the government and the anti-terror Muslim terrorists.
If you feel that your head is about to burst, you are not alone. The rubber band is reaching its structural limits.
Just my thoughts!
Friday, February 19, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment