IAEA Fails Because Of USA

By Semperpapa

Ok, this would be laughable if it was not so outrageous.

According to a representative of the United Nations nuclear watchdog, the agency is so under funded (which really translates in America does not pay enough) that it may very well happen that the world could see an undetected proliferation of nuclear activities.

The IAEA representative, one Olli Heinonen compared the “dire” financial conditions of the agency to the collapse of financial institutions in 2008, certainly a coincidental reference to the “crisis” that propelled a massive bailout at the expenses of the American taxpayers. But I digress.

The so called experts are sounding the alarm about the possibility of a nuclear arm race in areas affected by certain nations having nuclear capability. The allusion is clearly directed at the acquisition, in short time, of nuclear weapons on the part of Iran. None of the countries surrounding the rogue regime of Teheran is happy that a nut case like Ahmedinejad would be in possession of nuclear weapons.

But the problem, according to these “experts” is that the lack of sufficient funding for the IAEA could make things worst.

Mark Fitzpatrick, of the International Institute for Strategic Studies, is one who is warning that the IAEA will have many more potential sites to oversee across the globe, as many countries will embark on a race to avoid lagging behind technologically to nations already in possession of nuclear technology.

What these people are doing is to send a message of doom to the American people and their leaders, all in the name of plundering more money from the American taxpayers.

And what do we have as an example of the work of the IAEA so far to inspire the American people to fork out more money? How about Iran? Maybe North Korea?

Fitzpatrick acknowledges that the IAEA has had some failures, but he is also quick to state that the failures of the UN agency were caused by the lack of proper tools and the proper authority to perform their job. Of course, not their fault, but the fault of all the nations, especially the United States.

Fitzpatrick also defends the accomplishments of the agency in delineating the violations of agreements of the Iranian nuclear program for the last 20 years. I am really impressed.

I would like to find out what has been the cost of these findings to the American taxpayers, because I would be interested in knowing how much money was spent to achieve practically nothing, considering that the Teheran insane asylum is ever closer to achieve nuclear capabilities, while Kim Jong Il already possess them.

The increase in the agency budget is to be shared by all nations, with 25% of the total being contributed to by the United States (surprise, surprise!), but many countries are opposed to it due to the current economic priorities they are faced with. But Obama wants to double that budget in the next four years.

I find also ironic that the American people are subjected to such doom scenario pressure at a time when the liberal leadership of the country is pushing for the ratification of the START treaty with Russia, a treaty that would further prohibit the United States to remain vigilant against nuclear foes and maintain an adequate level of deterrence against the big boys out there like Russia and China.

So in reality what we are seeing is a President and a political ruling class that is in line with reducing our National capability while increase our support for a failed and corrupted international agency.

Or more like the further relinquishing of our sovereignty to be replaced by dependency on international law.

The IAEA, as much as its parent organization United Nations, is nothing more than an international scam directed at the realization of the dreaded New World Order. Its inefficiency, and the passive policies of appeasement that have plagued many world leaders and exacerbated by Obama, has created the fertile environment for a major world conflict. And done so on the dime of the American people.

Now they have the audacity of accusing us of not giving enough and the Obama regime appears to be in agreement.

Just my thoughts!