One More Reason To Ban CAIR

By Semperpapa

Regardless of the fact that there are already numerous reasons for banning the CAIR organization in America, principle one being their proven connections with the terror group Hamas, the recent elections give us one more.

The state of Oklahoma had a proposition on their ballot on November 2nd that prohibits state judges from considering or using Shariah law or any international law from having any weight in adjudication of cases.

The proposition, called State Question 755, passed overwhelmingly. That is where CAIR comes into place.
The Islamic organization is intending to challenge the constitutionality of the proposition by filing a law suit against the law.

The merit of the suit may be depending on the intrinsic connections between Shariah law and Islam. That would be the basis of CAIR call for unconstitutionality, as the link between the Muslim religion and the barbaric law would make the ban on consideration as an anti-Muslim proposition.

It should be already well known that the basis of Shariah law is contrary to any form of civilized application of rules and guidelines for responsible behavior. The move on the part of CAIR is a double edged sword because ignoring the Oklahoma law would be no help to the slow invasion the Islamist have been conducting. On the other hand, filing the suit could mean that the true nature of Shariah law, in all its uncivilized magnitude, would become page one news, at least among the non-apologetic characters of the political arena and the media.

It will be definitely interesting to see what the outcome of this situation is. In the first place, is the Oklahoma judicial system going to allow the law suit to proceed. Second, if so, what is the judicial system going to decide. Lastly, how are the people of Oklahoma going to react.

What we have here is the latest attempt of CAIR to infiltrate the very core of our system, in pure Islamic manner: slow, patient and unperturbed chipping away at the foundations of our system.
Some will argue that a ban of Shariah law from any consideration in judicial decisions is a violation of the First Amendment rights of people to worship.
Just the fact that it is called “Shariah Law” debunks that assertion. The United States has its well defined legal guidelines. They are established by the U.S. Constitution and by the thousands of laws that govern our society. The Nation should not be bound to introduce in the system the provisions of a specific religious belief. That is what the people of Oklahoma clearly stated.

The attempt on the part of CAIR is to continue to process of infiltration that has been so successful in several other countries, especially Great Britain, where Shariah Law is taken into consideration in the adjudication of cases involving Muslim defendants. Basically, the adherence of an Islamic defendant to the law dictated by his or her religious belief may be a mitigating factor in the final outcome of the case.

Realistically, there should be no room in the judicial system of any civilized society for the barbaric guidelines of a pseudo legal set of rules that call for stoning, beheading, amputations, and the consistent, brutal subjugation of women.

What the people of Oklahoma decided on November 2nd was the absolute right thing to do. It was a clear and vocal rejection of the People of any interference from foreign entities into the American judicial system.
Personally, I believe that the law suit from CAIR is an indication that the organization is taking the legal step to try and subvert the legal system of a sovereign state of the United States. Just for that reason alone, not to even mention its ties with the terror group Hamas and the radical Muslim organization of the Muslim Brotherhood, should be reason enough for the government to dissolve the group at a national level.

Of course, that prospect is a mute one, as the current administration, and especially the corrupted Department of Justice, would never pursuit such course of action.

I wonder if the DoJ will file discrimination law suit against the state of Oklahoma. Would not surprise me.

Just my thoughts!